[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL3m8eAuF09CeV9JHCX+cYzZjm++07LmmAitpcTBQXZQOhnZYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:07:26 -0500
From: Strake <strake888@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Best place to discuss other lightweight libraries?
On 22/04/2013, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
> [Java] did dynamic memory management but _kept_ static
> typing, then realized how dumb taht was
So they realized that it's a damn good idea, but somehow made a crap
language nevertheless.
Haskell, for example, does dynamic memory allocation with static
types, and quite often wins.
> So back to the "new generation of system languages": C is a portable
> assembly language. It's a category killer in that niche, the best there
> is at what it does that's already killed off competitors like Pascal.
So on that note, I deem Haskell would be a categorical category killer (^_^)
Cheers,
Strake
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
