[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F833E121-11B4-45C0-9F7C-D061B149CFD9@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 20:47:59 -0700
From: nwmcsween@...il.com
To: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Building libc separately from libm,librt,libpthread and others
Musl is a posix + iso c standard library, there is no separation of standards..
On Apr 7, 2013, at 7:43 AM, Timerlan Moldobaev <moldobaev@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you please help with reducing the size of statically linked libc.a library ?
> Whereas the comparison table located in http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html
> claims the size of complete .a set as 333k, I got around 2M while building the library on x86_64 with gcc version 4.1.1.
> I suppose that might be caused by including in libc.a object files that belong to libm, librt, libpthread and others.
> Am I right ?
> Is there any way to compile libc.a solely ?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim.
>
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
