[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49d0123e066520d95aeaf0e18684fe64.squirrel@alpha.tmit.bme.hu>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 22:47:23 +0200
From: meres5@...ha.tmit.bme.hu
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: vfprintf.c:(.text+0xc6c): undefined reference to
`__signbitl'
That's a string to pull.
I've stucked with EGLIBC too, but
make ARCH=ppc64 "CC=gcc -m64"
tossed forward until got
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-mno-vsx"
make[2]: *** [/home/meres5/src/eglibc/ports/gmon/mcount.o] Error 1
Why is so painful to say no to a nonexistent thing?
LOL again.
Facing interesting hours though...
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:39:19PM +0200, meres5@...ha.tmit.bme.hu wrote:
>> Hi out there,
>>
>> I build the latest musl under
>>
>> meres5@...ha:~/tmp$ uname -a
>> Linux alpha 2.6.32-5-powerpc64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 3 07:59:38 UTC 2011 ppc64
>> GNU/Linux
>
> On powerpc, musl uses the old long-double ABI where long double is the
> same as double. It sounds like your gcc was built for 128-bit long
> double, which is completely soft-float. For some reason the GCC and
> glibc folks decided this would be a smart thing to do, despite the
> fact that it's very slow and forces you to link a lot of soft-float
> bloat into every single program (I guess they don't care because they
> only do dynamic linking...?).
>
> Anyway, there may be a way to override this on the gcc command line,
> but the best solution would be to rebuild your gcc toolchain to use
> 64-bit long-double (same as double).
>
> Rich
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
