[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130329112527.GE30576@port70.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:25:27 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl and gcc-4.8 (sabotage)
* Daniel Cegie?ka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> [2013-03-29 12:07:33 +0100]:
> 2013/3/29 Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:39:03AM +0100, Daniel Cegie??ka wrote:
> >> @@ -81,19 +86,23 @@
> >> #define BIONIC_DYNAMIC_LINKER32 "/system/bin/linker"
> >> #define BIONIC_DYNAMIC_LINKER64 "/system/bin/linker64"
> >> #define BIONIC_DYNAMIC_LINKERX32 "/system/bin/linkerx32"
> >> +#define MUSL_DYNAMIC_LINKER "/lib/ld-musl.so.1"
> >
> > This is almost certainly wrong.
>
> What solution do you suggest? Below is the code, which was used for gcc-4.8:
there is no ARCH, see the musl Makefile:
LDSO_PATHNAME = $(syslibdir)/ld-musl-$(ARCH).so.1
> https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross/src/74d6e78976bda668af0046f4514cbce1f363c6cd/patches/gcc-4.7.2-musl.diff?at=default
here the ARCH is there
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
