|
Message-Id: <20130327151410.e0017c81.idunham@lavabit.com> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:14:10 -0700 From: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Will musl work as a lsb alternative? (was Re: re: musl setup attempt) On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:23:46 -0400 LM <lmemsm@...il.com> wrote: > FLTK usually requires X Windows (although there's an older > version that has a port to DirectFB that might be worth > investigating). Am wondering if I can build the X libraries from > scratch with musl, if they'll interact with the host system's X server > or if a user would need to exit their X server and use a musl built X > server and X libraries. You can build the X libraries against musl; you might want to pass --target=i486-linux-gnu since autoconf sometimes thinks it's dealing with libc5. FYI, there is a project called tinyxlib based on a mix of work from xwoaf, Amigo Linux, one or two Puppy developers, and some other sources; I have a git repo for working on it at github.com/idunham/tinyxlib It's not full-featured or complete, but there's enough to build several applications, it's small, and it only takes a couple minutes to build the commonly-used libs, so you might be interestin in trying it. Edit standard_definitions.mk to suit your site. Of course, you will need a C++ compiler to do anything with FLTK. X is called a "server" for a reason: assuming you don't have incompatible extensions, you can use any x server and any application you want as long as they can connect. For example, you can: -run musl and libc5 X apps with glibc X servers -have IRIX, BSD, or Solaris apps running remotely and displaying locally on a glibc-based Linux system HTH, Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.