|
Message-Id: <1363713627.15703.33@driftwood> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:20:27 -0500 From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> To: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> Cc: toybox@...ts.landley.net, musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [Toybox] toybox: Rough edges in pending On 03/19/2013 01:50:43 AM, Isaac Dunham wrote: > Hello, > I don't expect these to be very high priority, but I ran into a few > rough edges > when enabling almost all the toys in pending: Um, yes. Until recently half the stuff in pending didn't even _compile_. There's a _reason_ the default to 'n'. It's a directory full of things that people are unhappy if I keep out of tree (usually for months), but which aren't ready to be used either. On balance, if I can't find a warning sign large enough, I'm just going to delete the whole directory and start keeping it out of tree again. > -sh: > toys/pending/sh.c: In function 'run_pipeline': > toys/pending/sh.c:303: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer > type > Apparently, gcc doesn't recognize both rebound and toys.rebound Oh wow, toysh. No, it was never more than a stub and the rest of the code has changed drastically around it in the ~4 years since the last time it was touched. It needed fixups just to compile again, and I only did that because after my talk at CELF people kept telling me that "allyesconfig" didn't build. (And I went "I know, it's not supposed to", and this confused them...) I should have called the directory "slushpile". > Also, when toybox is built with musl, and toybox sh executes ls, > I get a hang; strace indicates that something funny is going on: I am honestly amazed it got _that_ far. > I anticipate this is a bug in musl, so I'll cross-post. If toysh _isn't_ corrupting the heap or something similar, I'd be stunned. It's not a real command yet. Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.