|
Message-Id: <20130317215846.920449a9.idunham@lavabit.com> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:58:46 -0700 From: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: musl vs util-linux: main issues Hello, I've been poking at util-linux 2.22.2 in hopes of getting it to compile (one of the Puppy developers was trying to get it for rev, mount, umount, and losetup; I'm not sure why he didn't use busybox). The following are the issues I ran across so far, building with _GNU_SOURCE defined: -include/cpuset.h (replacement for some macros that glibc includes via sched.h): Assumes that <sched.h> defines __cpumask, __NCPUBITS, __CPUELT, __CPUMASK, cpu_set_t. glibc defines these in <bits/sched.h>, so they might vary by arch. Several other places, including agetty: Need macros from <sys/ttydefaults.h>. cfdisk: __sighandler_t for sighandler_t (easy to fix) Thank you, Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.