[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360591648.9132.117.camel@eris.loria.fr>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:07:28 +0100
From: Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Have different definitions of
__pthread_tsd_main agree in size
Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 08:44 -0500 schrieb Rich Felker:
> The current intended usage is that __environ is used in ISO C
> functions and startup code that must not reference the name environ
> (since it's in the namespace reserved for the application), and POSIX
> and extension functions use environ.
If this was the intended use, the effective use was not in line with
it. execv and execvp had it differently.
> There's no reason the latter
> _need_ to use environ though; it was just more convenient and less
> implementation-specific. If you think there's a good reason to change
> it after reading this, let's discuss it.
With what I have added in my other mail (and you have snipped :) in
the current model there is even the danger that environ and __environ
split into two different objects.
char **environ;
int main(void) {
return (long)&environ;
}
When compile-linking this with musl I get both symbols environ and
__environ linked in.
So it would at least be good that the internal use of it in musl would
be consistent and the C library would not see two distinct objects.
Jens
--
:: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :: http://www.loria.fr/~gustedt/ ::
:: AlGorille ::::::::::::::: office Nancy : +33 383593090 ::
:: ICube :::::::::::::: office Strasbourg : +33 368854536 ::
:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: gsm France : +33 651400183 ::
:: :::::::::::::::::::: gsm international : +49 15737185122 ::
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
