[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130208221408.GN20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 17:14:08 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: printf warning with uintmax_t
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:10:39PM +0100, Jens Gustedt wrote:
> Hi again,
> with musl-gcc the following test program produces a bogus warning
> concerning uintmax_t on my machine (ubuntu amd64)
>
> Jens
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
>
> void toto(void) {
> uintmax_t val = 42;
> printf("%jX\n", val);
> }
It looks like we're not matching the ABI convention gcc expects, where
[u]intmax_t is the lowest-rank type capable of storing the full
integer range (i.e. long on 64-bit systems).
This should probably be fixed, if for no other reason than C++ ABI
issues.
Any objections?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
