[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <510D7953.50308@opensource.dyc.edu>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:38:43 -0500
From: "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@...nsource.dyc.edu>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for mkostemp, mkstemps and mkostemps
Okay let me try those fixes. Some points:
1. I forgot to remove a group of headers when I refactorized. So
mkostemp.c mkostemps.c mkstemp.c and mkstemps.c only need
#include <fcntl.h>
#include "libc.h"
or
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include "libc.h"
2. This is from uclibc. Clearly, static is critical here, but still
they never initialize a value of 'value' on first entry into the
function, so that memory is dirty to start. Mine is worse, but I wonder
if this is still a bug there.
static void brain_damaged_fillrand(unsigned char *buf, unsigned int len)
{
...
static uint64_t value;
gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
value += ((uint64_t) tv.tv_usec << 16) ^ tv.tv_sec ^ getpid();
...
3. I retested your address approach. I like it but it only maps to
upper and lower case letters, no numbers which uclibc and glibc do.
clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts);
r = ts.tv_nsec*65537 ^ (uintptr_t)&ts / 16 + (uintptr_t)template;
for (i=0; i<6; i++, r>>=5)
template[i] = 'A'+(r&15)+(r&16)*2;
On 02/02/2013 03:14 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Anthony G. Basile <basile@...nsource.dyc.edu> [2013-02-02 13:45:31 -0500]:
>> + /* Null terminate the template before the suffix,
>> + and save the char for adding back the suffix */
>> + char suffix = template[l];
>> + template[l] = '\0';
>
> if you set only the XXXXXX part in __randname, then the \0 is unnecessary
>
>> + int fd, retries = 100;
>> + while (retries--) {
>> + if (!*__randname(template)) return -1;
>
> __randname cannot fail, so the check is unnecessary
>
>> +/* This assumes that a check for the
>> + template size has alrady been made */
>> +char *__randname(char *template)
>> +{
>> + struct timespec ts;
>> + size_t i, l = strlen(template);
>> +
>> + /* r is intentially uninialized and 'dirty' */
>> + unsigned long r;
>> +
>
> it's undefined behaviour so the compiler is allowed to
> completely remove the code of this function
>
> if you seen this kind of code somewhere, that's a critical
> bug that should be reported
>
> the original address based entropy source was ok
>
>> + clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts);
>> + r += ((uint64_t) ts.tv_nsec << 16) ^ ts.tv_sec;
>> + for (i=1; i<=6; i++, r>>=6)
>> + template[l-i] = __map_letter(r);
>> +
>> + return template;
>> +}
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
