[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1358862044.2172.216.camel@6-core>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:40:44 +0100
From: pierre <pierre@...entlife.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
Subject: Re: dladdr()
Nagy,
> instead of 'debug mode' vs 'release mode' the
> config.mak with compiler flags/architecture/..
> for the two cases
> instead of 'crash' the details of the caught
> signal, backtrace, memory map etc
> a link to the source code or a minimal example
> can help too
Since I already said that I would provide this
information later (I also have a job) I wonder
what the purpose of these repeated calls is.
PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THREAT before adding your
grain of salt.
> i'm not sure how populating backtrace with
> dladdr works
By finding the symbols that match each IP
(Instruction Pointer) address.
> sounds suspicious
I am impressed by the value of this argument.
> how do you get your backtrace?
By following stack frames. I am curious to learn
what better way you will find less "suspicious".
Pierre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
