[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F536F9AD-D97C-42FD-B453-02CC232845AF@palsenberg.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:17:47 +0100
From: Igmar Palsenberg <igmar@...senberg.com>
To: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: malloc(0) behaviour
Hi,
Is there a (good) reason for Musl to follow glibc's malloc(0) behaviour ? Musl returns a valid pointer, which is fine according
to the standard, but returning NULL is also fine.
IMHO, returning NULL is better : It usually kills the program if actual storage is attempted. You also can't do that if a valid pointer
is returned, so I really can't grasp the reason for returning a pointer at all, except to support buggy and lazy programming.
I suggest we make malloc(0) return a NULL pointer. Any objections ?
Regards,
Igmar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
