|
Message-ID: <CAPLrYESQUc2_UmX6RqDMeHS=8mE2Csz1M1PNR1KszyDxo53gMg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:00:48 +0100 From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: iproute2 and musl (netinet/tcp.h) 2013/1/14 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>: > * Daniel Cegie?ka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> [2013-01-14 21:35:16 +0100]: >> (netinet/tcp.h) - iproute2/misc/ss.c tries to use netinet/tcp.h. Do we >> need to improve netinet/tcp.h in musl? >> > > i think we should provide the TCP_* socket options > from linux/tcp.h and hide SOL_TCP under feature > test macros as posix only reserves TCP_ for netinet/tcp.h > > i searched for tcp things in the iproute package using > codesearch.debian.net and it seems it provides its own > netinet/tcp.h, i guess iproute2 should do the same > or use the linux header directly if it wants something > special ok, thanks Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.