[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27737.50.0.224.127.1356922708.squirrel@lavabit.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 18:58:28 -0800 (PST)
From: idunham@...abit.com
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: STLport
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:11:18PM +1100, Grant Gray wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>>
>> Is anyone working on getting STLport working with musl?
>>
>>
>> I had a quick look at the STLport sources and it seems to assume
>> glibc is in use if the toolchain is GCC, so it seems some porting
>> effort is required to get it working with musl.
>
> Is there a reason you want to use STLport rather than libstdc++ or
> libc++? My impression was that STLport was outdated, unmaintained, and
> full of ugly legacy hackery from the 90s...
The last tarball is from 2008. So yes, I'd call it unmaintained. Even
DJGPP's GCC is more current than that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
