|
Message-Id: <20121231120334.05263f66.idunham@lavabit.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:03:34 -0800 From: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: lshw FTBFS: res_querydomain declared but not implemented On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:06:53 -0500 Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 09:59:31PM -0800, Isaac Dunham wrote: > > I've been trying to build lshw [1] with musl, and I ran into a few problems: > > Have you sent any reports/patches upstream yet? I figured I'd get it to compile and see how it runs first. <snip> > > 3: It wants MAX_PATH from some header that doesn't have it: I added <limits.h> > > PATH_MAX is in limits.h. MAXPATHLEN is in sys/param.h (bogus header > full of random miscellaneous junk). I don't think I've ever heard of > MAX_PATH... Sorry, I meant PATH_MAX. > > 4: It wants res_querydomain. > > This does not show up until link time, since <resolv.h> declares it. > > However, musl does not acually implement this function. > > And it seems to be completely undocumented how it's supposed to > work... Call res_query with name as "name.domain". It's described in the linux-dev manpages. > > Currently, I've got a very hackish implementation that isn't fit to ship: > > -it doesn't check for name == "machine." > > What is special about "machine."? That was a bad example; I meant "Doesn't check for a terminal '.'" > > -it does no error checking, on the assumption that res_query can handle that. > > Seems fine. > > BTW a full name can never be longer than 256 bytes (including null > termination), so you can do the concatenation on the stack in a > fixed-size array. You'll need to generate your own error if the > combined length would exceed the max. Ah, thanks. -- Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.