[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1355083763.9353.2@driftwood>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 14:09:23 -0600
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: static linking and dlopen
On 12/08/2012 04:52:37 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> The source of all these problems is basically the same as the benefit
> of static linking: the fact that the linker resolves, statically at
> link time, which object files are needed to satisfy the needs of the
> program. With dlopen, however, there is no static answer; *any* object
> is potentially-needed, not directly by the main program, but possibly
> by loaded modules.
Is there some way you could put a dlopen() symbol in libc.a that forces
a build break? Perhaps a redirect to
dlopen_is_not_compatible_with_static_linking_go_read_posix?
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
