[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508E1ECB.9090903@barfooze.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:14:35 +0100
From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: interesting discussion about static linking on luajit ML
i thought some people here might be interested in a discussion that
currently happens on luajit@...elists.org
as usual, a strong bias against static linking can be seen, based on
myths or bad experience with glibc.
especially the statement here about memory usage seems to be a common
misconception:
http://www.freelists.org/post/luajit/Creating-a-statically-linked-executable-for-a-LuaJITC-program,22
rich, you recently said something about this topic on irc, iirc it was
along the lines of:
you'd need to link substantially huge parts of libc.a to use nearly as
much memory,
as is typically wasted with relocation overhead in dynamically linked
apps, do i remember correctly ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
