[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPW=hRSj2S8Lq-N08CT5dVAL9+aZZDcHYo5DRz2KYO36+uywAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:21:15 +0800
From: Brian Wang <brian.wang.0721@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Difference between -O2 and -g
Re-attaching the strace logs... (seems to be stripped out by the
server last time)
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Brian Wang <brian.wang.0721@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:31:56AM +0800, Brian Wang wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I am experiencing a rather strange problem...
>>>
>>> I have an oldish kdrive/Xfbdev that works on my ARM device with
>>> CodeSourcery toolchains.
>>> Now, I tried it with musl (0.9.6 and the recent git master branch as well).
>>> First it failed to find the screen and refused to start. After some naive
>>> attempts with printf without success, I recompiled it with -g and no
>>> -Ox with the hope that gdbserver
>>> would help pin point the problem. However, with only -g, it runs!
>>
>> -g should have absolutely no effect on code behavior, but it sounds
>> like your two setups are "-O2" and "-O0 -g" (where the -O0 is the
>> default). If that's the case, when code behaves differently with
>> different optimization levels, the cause is almost surely undefined
>> behavior. Another possibility is a bug in musl (possibly an
>> ARM-specific bug), but if you didn't recompile musl with different
>> options, I doubt that's the cause.
>>
>> One very simple way to get a picture of what's going on in a program
>> is to run it under strace. Try saving strace logs for both the working
>> version and the broken version and comparing them either manually or
>> with the diff utility (although the latter may be difficult unless you
>> filter out the addresses and other contnets that will naturally
>> differ, so it might be easier to visually inspect). If you don't
>> already have an strace built for your target, I think Aboriginal Linux
>> has static binaries you can use.
>
> I have previously built my static strace.
> I could not decipher what went wrong. Please find the strace logs for
> the three binaries in question.
> The source code is basically the same, except for the musl ones,
> printf calls are sprinkled here and there
> as my desperate attempt.
>
>>
>> If you're having trouble analyzing the results I'd be happy to help
>> you.
>>
>> Rich
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> --
> brian
> ------------------
>
> Cool-Karaoke - The smallest recording studio, in your palm, open-sourced
> http://cool-idea.com.tw/
>
> iMaGiNaTiOn iS mOrE iMpOrTaNt tHaN kNoWlEdGe
--
brian
------------------
Cool-Karaoke - The smallest recording studio, in your palm, open-sourced
http://cool-idea.com.tw/
iMaGiNaTiOn iS mOrE iMpOrTaNt tHaN kNoWlEdGe
View attachment "Xfbdev-glibc-O2.log.txt" of type "text/plain" (34094 bytes)
View attachment "Xfbdev-musl-debug.log.txt" of type "text/plain" (80060 bytes)
View attachment "Xfbdev-musl-O2.log.txt" of type "text/plain" (14634 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
