[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121004223631.GL254@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 18:36:31 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: TLS (thread-local storage) support
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:29:11PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> great news! Finally able to compile Go (lang)...
Did Go fail with gcc's emulated TLS in libgcc? My impression is that
it should usually/always work, but it's just very slow and
low-quality (lazy allocation). This isn't gcc's fault, just the fact
that it's impossible to emulate correctly. On the other hand, Go might
be generating code that accesses TLS directly, in which case the
emulation may not suffice.
BTW, does Go work with static linking? If not, you might need to wait
to celebrate until I add the dynamic-linked TLS support...
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
