[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <710a87b2d5bfe6b6cef918f4217bc07a@exys.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:38:59 +0000
From: "Arvid E. Picciani" <aep@...s.org>
To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Musl-extra: C general-purpose and utility library
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:31:47 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> Personally, I think a clean, sane, bloat-free implementation of the
> C++ standard library would be a lot more valuable for this kind of
> work than a new non-standardized C library.
for C++? pretty hard to do that, the language is horrible already :/
I like Qt, since it doesn't even try to follow the C++ spirit,
but then again its weird on its own.
Indeed, C is not the place to do high level stuff in.
I'm still waiting for clay [http://claylabs.com/clay/] to become
usable,
before dropping C++ for system services.
--
Arvid E. Picciani
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
