[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f7bd1eadcdc1b4d3c7e4e91a6ede511@exys.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:21:15 +0200
From: "Arvid E. Picciani" <aep@...s.org>
To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Feelings on macros vs inline in arch/$(ARCH)/syscall_arch.h ?
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 14:23:44 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> Using inline functions is nicer from standpoint of clean [..]
>
> Using macros [..] could improve code generation especially on mips
> and i386/PIC.
I use musl because i can read it. For anything performance relevant we
get customized bionic/gnulibc from vendors.
If i may, i suggest restricting performance optimizations at the cost
of readability to areas that actually have a measurable effect for
someone.
--
Arvid E. Picciani
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
