[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLrYETBXXOb7VpucBApU=ih0wK=x5DUR6RMAc0=fGQQrOLfbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 14:35:22 +0200
From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: documenting musl
2012/9/8 Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@...ma.in>:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:44:03AM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
>> btw. documentation - mandoc is a better option than (old/big/ugly)
>> groff for documentation.
>
> None of those links explain why they seem to think it's either groff or
> roll-your-own, when there are plenty of lightweight roff
> implementations. Any hints?
hmm... mandoc isn't lightweight? :)
# du -h | grep image/
20.0K ./image/usr/share/man/man1
8.0K ./image/usr/share/man/man8
32.0K ./image/usr/share/man
36.0K ./image/usr/share
248.0K ./image/usr/bin
288.0K ./image/usr
# ls -lh image/usr/bin/
total 244
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Sep 8 12:24 apropos -> mandoc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Sep 8 12:24 makewhatis -> mandoc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 243.9K Sep 8 12:24 mandoc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Sep 8 12:24 mandocdb -> mandoc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Sep 8 12:24 whatis -> mandoc
compared to groff (gentoo):
(cut...)
7.1M ./image/usr/share
4.0K ./image/usr/lib64/groff/site-tmac
60K ./image/usr/lib64/groff/groffer
68K ./image/usr/lib64/groff
72K ./image/usr/lib64
3.4M ./image/usr/bin
11M ./image/usr
11M ./image
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
