[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120908124723.GA68331@intma.in>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 08:47:23 -0400
From: Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@...ma.in>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: documenting musl
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 02:35:22PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> 2012/9/8 Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@...ma.in>:
> > On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:44:03AM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> >> btw. documentation - mandoc is a better option than (old/big/ugly)
> >> groff for documentation.
> >
> > None of those links explain why they seem to think it's either groff or
> > roll-your-own, when there are plenty of lightweight roff
> > implementations. Any hints?
>
> hmm... mandoc isn't lightweight? :)
>
<snip>
>
> compared to groff (gentoo):
>
<snip>
>
> Daniel
Now you're doing it. There are dozens of other roff implementations,
such as the one that comes with 9base, or the heirloom doctools, etc.
Why does everyone who uses mandoc ignore everything but groff?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
