|
Message-ID: <50494f10.a3e5440a.5221.ffffdf6a@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 19:34:05 -0600 From: "Anthony J. Bentley" <anthony@...het.us> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add _Noreturn specifier to functions specified as such by ISO C11 philomath writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:12:36 -0400 > Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 08:02:35PM +0200, philomath wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Here is an updated version, addressing the issues rich mentioned. > > > > > > Should I add _Noreturn to other functions too (such as the various a_cras > h > > > versions, *err*, etc)? > > > > I don't really care about the err.h functions; these are legacy junk > > and should not be used in modern programs. err.h functions are not considered legacy by the BSDs, and are still recommended in their style guides.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.