Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120825080318.GB30997@port70.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:03:18 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: build musl with clang

* agent <agentprog@...il.com> [2012-08-25 11:57:16 +0600]:
> that is stilled optimized for a plain malloc call even if i call
> not_called_malloc directly and not via a macro. to test the bug i
> used the following function:
> 
> void *foo(size_t n) {
> static char buf[200];
> return buf + 10;
> }
> 

don't define the function, just add a prototype

that's the use case we are trying to test
(clang does not know the definition of
malloc at the point it's used)

a defined function in the same translation unit
of course results different optimizations..

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.