[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1947207.xjPR6uPfRS@main.pennware.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:24:13 -0500
From: Richard Pennington <rich@...nware.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
Subject: Re: Todo for release?
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 02:57:09 PM Rich Felker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:45:01PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Very helpful would be support for fts.h in musl:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man3/fts.3.html
>
> Can these functions be implemented purely as library functionality,
> without any hooks into libc internals? I was thinking it might be nice
> to isolate all such code into a single subtree in musl, so that folks
> wanting to use it outside musl (either directly in application source
> trees, or in libraries) could easily find and use it.
>
> Of course there's also the option of putting such code in a separate
> library outside of libc (i.e. not including it in libc) which some
> people might prefer, but if it's small and historically in libcs and
> doesn't create maintenance burden, I'm not opposed to having it in
> libc..
>
> Rich
I used the NetBSD version and it built with musl just fine with no internal
stuff, as I recall.
http://ellcc.org/viewvc/svn/ellcc/trunk/libecc/src/musl/src/bsd/
-Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
