[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <502B9CB6.6000802@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:57:26 +0200
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Todo for release?
On 8/15/12 6:08 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> On hold pending details on what the real problem is; unlikely to make
> it in for next release.
>
> Luca, if you still want this, please provide details on what issues
> you're facing that could be solved. I don't want to target old
> versions of standards unless there's a concrete practical goal. I
> mentioned one possible approach (using old versions only as a way to
> reenable stuff that was removed from the standard, not a way to get
> the entire outdated-standard behavior that would also require removing
> new symbols) but I haven't heard back on whether that would meet your
> needs.
Your approach would be fine even making something wrong like exposing
all the symbols would be ok for my specific purposes.
Alternatively forcing one of the two SOURCES would work as well.
lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
