[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLrYERwFGbTor2om6aW94j5uC6XY+wuOWTbbB1=aU-ho-mcvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:45:50 +0200
From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Design for extensible passwd[/shadow?] db support
2012/8/13 Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 08:26:24PM -0400, idunham@...abit.com wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, is PAM excluded from consideration? Does it require a
>> dynamically-loaded library?
>
> PAM is not an implementation of the user database. It's for
> authenticating logins. Completely different problem domain.
A bit off topic: Is the traditional PAM/shadow will be supported in
musl? I would like to use full PAM/shadow/tcb stack from the Owl
with musl (+owl's pam modules). If not, what would be an alternative proposal?
best regards,
Daniel
>
> Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
