Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <65E116B4-1634-478A-957E-A7B374396614@palsenberg.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:15:38 +0200
From: Igmar Palsenberg <musl@...senberg.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/10] GLIBC ABI patches



>> Just nonsense aliases GNU uses...
>> Needed for ABI compatability.
> 
> could we mark them as such? at least with a comment.
> I really like that musl is so readable. This patch adds some obfuscation that can simply be countered by marking it as "ok this is only here for reason X."

I would like to see those options behind a compile time option : It bloats musl with in many cases unneeded code. I test my compiles with musl, and I like it lean and mean.


Regards,



	Igmar

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.