[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120708170913.495dcaef@sibserver.ru>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:09:13 +0800
From: orc <orc@...server.ru>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Hello
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:54:08 -0400 (EDT)
idunham@...abit.com wrote:
> Converting a system (as described in musl/INSTALL) does not mean
> replacing libc; it means a parallel install of musl, move system libs
> out of the default search path, then change gcc to use musl by
> default. It would work even with an ABI-incompatible libc, since you
> leave ld-linux alone.
I still think that this is a generally bad idea - having dancing around
to just make it work with musl. I will do rebuild instead, with reduced
number of packages.
(Nvidia was as an exception here: it is binary blob designed to work
only with glibc)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
