|
Message-ID: <20120626025002.GH544@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:50:02 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Possible ARM struct stat problem. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:15:25AM +0200, John Spencer wrote: > >I'm not entirely opposed to putting the explicit padding in there, > >since this is an arch-specific structure anyway, but I think you > >should check your compiler. The same issue might come up elsewhere and > >might not be so easy to work around. > > > please apply the explicit padding. All this would have done is hide the issue that you're using the wrong ABI (oabi instead of eabi) and make it harder to find the more-subtle resulting bugs later (mildly different calling convention and padding). Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.