[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8RtFqi3dC5fc-zN5baUhteaFRM7UbDH0atu7Mbi+vVFonNdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:03:58 +0200
From: Jens Staal <staal1978@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Hello
2012/6/7 John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de>:
> On 06/07/2012 05:18 PM, orc wrote:
>>
> what kept me from configuring X11 to work properly is its huge freaking
> complexity.
> if an older version is simpler and can do the job as well, i'm all for it.
> i fear though that you won't get any up-to-date software compiled against
> it.
> probably not worth the effort.
>
> --JS
What about Tiny Core Linux's "tinyX", and perhaps one could even
compile that statically? I have no idea how compatible that is to
Xorg's X11 though... Another appealing alternative could be if there
is a small X11 layer to run on top of Wayland, if that would be easier
to build/configure.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
