[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA1044C.90406@unixsol.org>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:54:20 +0300
From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@...xsol.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
Subject: Re: Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9
Around 05/02/2012 12:49 PM, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski scribbled:
> Around 04/24/2012 03:31 AM, Rich Felker scribbled:
>> I was just looking back at the wishlist for 1.0 dated a little over a
>> year ago, and noticing that all but 3 items on it are completed. (The
>> incomplete ones are static-linked dlopen support, limited ability to
>> load/run glibc-linked apps/libs, and documentation.)
>>
>> As for 0.9, there was never a formal wishlist, but I've covered all
>> the intended areas mentioned as short-term goals in the past few
>> release announcements. I think musl could use some more testing
>> scrutiny before the big release (we don't want it to be like gcc
>> 4.7... :), so I'm going to hold off a bit; please continue to report
>> bugs and app compatibility issues so we can get as much working as
>> possible, with as few bugs as possible, for 0.9.
>
> Hi, there were talks about re-licensing musl to BSD like license, what
> happened to that?
Sorry for asking the second time, I was unable to find my first e-mail /it
has gone to Junk folder because of failed SPF/. Again, sorry.
--
Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
http://georgi.unixsol.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
