[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120424125524.1d699880@newbook>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:55:24 -0700
From: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Request for comments: website updates?
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:01:16 -0400
Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote:
> I know a lot of stuff in the musl website is a bit outdated, lacking
> in details, etc. and I'd appreciate some ideas to get it more
> useful/informative between now and the 0.9 release. Website is a GREAT
> bikeshed so come on everybody, have at it.. ;-)
>
Update the comparisons?
IIRC, glibc has dropped the rpc headers and expect a third-party
implementation to be used (tirpc was one, IIRC).
The ABI is still present there.
Sizes for musl are outdated (~575k libc.so, nearly 1.4 MB libc.a here).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
