|
Message-ID: <20120422054055.GH14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:40:55 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl vs wireless-tools On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:56:11PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > Well, make iwmulticall produced iwmulticall.o and a ton of errors. > But > musl-gcc -static iwmulticall.o -o iwhack > made a working binary... > (you won't find out if it's really working unless you copy or link to > iw{config,event,getid,list,priv,spy}, however) > > So one of the options it's passing ends up breaking the musl-gcc > link step. The source is compatible with musl, though. Have you tried with the new draft wrapper I posted? It might fix the issue. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.