|
Message-Id: <20120421154526.f7257d3a.idunham@lavabit.com> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:45:26 -0700 From: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: New gcc wrapper to try On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 02:49:33 -0400 Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote: > Hi, > Here's the latest draft of a new concept for the musl-gcc gcc wrapper. > It's almost entirely gcc specfile-based. If it works well, I intend to > move even more of what it does into the specfile, and instead of > generating the specfile at runtime each time it's run, just have it > generated at build time and installed with musl. > Please let me know how it works. (You'll need to edit the first couple > lines to set the paths/arch if you don't use the defaults.) I intend to test it, but have some work to do beforehand. I've been using /opt/musl, myself. By the way, I had an idea for handling musl-gcc -V: if [ "-V" = "$1" ] gcc="gcc -V $2" shift 2 fi -- Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.