Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120421154526.f7257d3a.idunham@lavabit.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:45:26 -0700
From: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: New gcc wrapper to try

On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 02:49:33 -0400
Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote:

> Hi,
> Here's the latest draft of a new concept for the musl-gcc gcc wrapper.
> It's almost entirely gcc specfile-based. If it works well, I intend to
> move even more of what it does into the specfile, and instead of
> generating the specfile at runtime each time it's run, just have it
> generated at build time and installed with musl.

> Please let me know how it works. (You'll need to edit the first couple
> lines to set the paths/arch if you don't use the defaults.)

I intend to test it, but have some work to do beforehand.  
I've been using /opt/musl, myself.
By the way, I had an idea for handling musl-gcc -V:
if [ "-V" = "$1" ]
	gcc="gcc -V $2"
	shift 2
fi

-- 
Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.