[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120419074836.GJ16237@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:48:37 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl 0.8.8 released
* Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> [2012-04-18 22:21:57 -0700]:
> Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:07:56 -0400
> > Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote:
> >
> > > With this release, musl seems to have complete interface-level
> > > coverage of ISO C99 and POSIX 2008. There are still some features
>
> > I forget what they were, but ISTR seeing one or two missing functions
> > in one of the headers I worked on.
> Ignore the above claim--looking back over the headers, I guess I was
> wrong.
>
btw there are approximate api coverage tables
(generated using ctags and nm vs posix functions and c99 annex b)
http://repo.or.cz/w/musl-tools.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/tab_posix.html
http://repo.or.cz/w/musl-tools.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/c99.html
c99 is really completely covered
(wchar_t is misreported, imaginary is compiler issue, fma macros are
arch dependent)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
