[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120316110023.bc4724d8.idunham@lavabit.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:00:23 -0700
From: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] makefile: Make default output compact and
similar to Linux kernel.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:42:09 -0400
Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:25:23AM +0200, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
> > This patch changes default make output to be similar to Linux kernel.
> > An example output looks like this:
> > CC src/unistd/write.c
> > LD lib/libc.so
> > BUILD tools/musl-gcc
> > INSTALL /usr/local/musl/lib/libc.a
..
>
> Any opinions on this? I really dislike this kind of output, but if
> there's a demand for it I'll consider it.
>
On the plus side, it makes spotting warnings/errors easier.
It does look a little cleaner, as well.
On the down side
-it complicates makefiles
-it hides what's happening (and often the flags gcc gets are the biggest problem)
-you can review the errors in full context later with
make 2>&1 | tee errors.log -
So my vote is that it isn't worth the effort.
--
Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
