[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4f75a9df9e517a22a5187ec3521de99@exys.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:19:40 +0100
From: aep <aep@...s.org>
To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Dynamic linker refactoring
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:05:54 -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm leaning towards stripping out the vdso
> (linux-gate) support at the dynamic linker level entirely, and
> instead
> using Nik's original design for vdso-assisted clock_gettime which can
> work with static linking too.
isn't the vdso there for much more then just clock_gettime? Ie for a
whole bunch of syscalls that otherwise need to go through the slow
interrupt path?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
