[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1DD4F3.5090206@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:25:07 +0200
From: Luka Marčetić <paxcoder@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: cluts review
On 07/13/2011 07:05 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
[...]
Maybe my Thunderbird is impotent, but this list gets swamped pretty
fast. Anyway, so I need SA_NODEFER because the handler doesn't return,
understood. As for the sigsetjmp and stuff, that's what we had before.
And yet again, I forgot why it was deprecated (I think there was signal
structs being different across platforms, though I'm not sure where the
problem was), but anyway Rich suggested sigaction.
This reminds me, the code is distinctly C99, and it tests SUSv4
functions, so if you don't mind, for cluts, I'll use those two standards
and go back to SA_NODEFER. If I decide to pay more attention to that
distributed computer project of yours in the future (I thought there
would be some smart CS people applying for that one), then the situation
will probably be different ;-)
Oh, and I do believe I know aht "clobbered" means (overwriting the new
value of the variable with the old one, from when the context was saved,
right?). That's what I've said I've checked with buf.c. I'll check it
for other relevant collections now too... Will push new minor fixes in a
few minutes.
Luka.
P.S. Perhaps I should start thinking about how the final cluts.c will
look like, otherwise it might become hard to change all the test
collections later...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
