[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1D8964.3020502@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:02:44 +0200
From: Luka Marčetić <paxcoder@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: cluts review
On 07/13/2011 01:07 PM, Solar Designer wrote [...]
Hmm, hope you won't mind me saying: Diff output for multiple files
replacing 1-2 non-subsequent lines is not very readable. Anyway, I'll
add _POSIX_SOURCE for sigaction and replace SA_NODEFER with 0 (I'm sure
it served its purpose *somewhere* :-/). Not sure why _BSD_SOURCE is
needed for alphasort, but I see from the man it is (I usually look up
functions from SUSv4), so I'll add that too. Instead of <sys/param.h>
for PATH_MAX, will limits.h do (that's what i usually include)?
> As it is, this patch is a hack. I think that extensive cleanups to the
> code being patched are needed.
As I've announced, alloc.c is going to be rewritten: As Rich suggested
to me, it'll use arrays instead of lists which will speed up things and
make them prettier.. actually I think it's in alloc.c's TODO. String.c
will also be rewritten, because, as I've said, it's impractical to write
so much code for a few tests (not sure yet how exactly). If there are
any other critiques, I would like to hear them.
> I have other observations as well (such as from actually running the
> tests), which I hope to post separately.
Ok. I only hope it's understood that I've made the tests report failures
alone. It would serve no purpose to output success messages (eg.
numeric.c would report a *lot* of things). If that's not what you meant,
shoot, I'm listening.
Thanks
Luka.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
