[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110502135245.GA18428@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 17:52:45 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Unit tests
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:32:57AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:30:28PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:11:24AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > Wow licenses are a much more popular discussion topic than
> > > development...
> >
> > Sorry about that. I should have posted the development related stuff I
> > told you on IRC yesterday to this mailing list instead. I will do that
> > next time. In fact... I'll post some of it in here now. :-)
>
> On mplayer, we called this kind of topic a bikeshed. ;-)
Right.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/mailing-list-faq/bikeshed.html
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bikeshed
Yet I think it is fairly important to decide on a license for the unit
tests suite. Perhaps you can just make a determination? I want to make
sure that whatever code Luka submits always has a suitable license on
it. This is my responsibility as a GSoC org admin.
In fact, once we decide on a license to use (at least initially), I
think we should ask Luka to re-post the code he has already written with
the proper licensing statement on it.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
