[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110429053605.GA27053@openwall.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:36:05 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Unit tests
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:29:31AM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote:
> I've come up with "C Library Unit Test Suite" - cluts, which sounds like
> "klutz" (besides being klutzy of itself).
"cluts" sounds good to me.
What license is it going to be under? I propose cut-down BSD (to the
point of being copyright only, with no restrictions):
This software is Copyright (c) YEAR YOUR NAME <your at e-mail.address>,
and it is hereby released to the general public under the following terms:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted.
This should be compatible with any other Open Source license, which I
think is a plus. We currently use this for contributions to JtR:
http://openwall.info/wiki/john/licensing
I see little reason to have GPL-like restrictions on the unit tests;
I think that would do more harm than good.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
