[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HE1P191MB0076687DAB5EFB60CC778A26FAF30@HE1P191MB0076.EURP191.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:59:11 +0000
From: Thomas Van Tongerloo <Thomas.VanTongerloo@...es.com>
To: "lkrg-users@...ts.openwall.com" <lkrg-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: LKRG Debian jessie
Since the original question was related to Debian, I can confirm lkrg-main compiles and runs fine on Debian Stretch, tested this morning on:
Linux XXX-DebianXX 4.9.0-5-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.65-3+deb9u2 (2018-01-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: Xavier Sheperd [mailto:xavier.sheperd@....com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 8:44 PM
To: lkrg-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [lkrg-users] LKRG Debian jessie
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 07:20:18PM +0100, Adam Zabrocki wrote:
>> CentOS6:
>> # uname -a
>> Linux centos6 2.6.32-696.20.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jan 26 17:51:45
>> UTC 2018
>> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>We are not supporting kernels 2.6.
Ack.
>
>CentOS 7 with 3.10 kernel is easy to run - remove get_random_long()
>declaration made by LKRG. This kernel backported patches with kernel declaration of it.
>
lkrg-main builds without errors, lkrg-experimental with 1 warning.
Both load and run fine.
>Thanks,
>Adam
Thank you for your help.
Xavier
P.S. I added the build logs, in case the details are useful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
