[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2011172308010.28480@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:11:00 +0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>
To: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@...il.com>
CC: <fweimer@...hat.com>, <gcc@....gnu.org>, <ville.voutilainen@...il.com>,
<linux-man@...r.kernel.org>, <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <libstdc++@....gnu.org>,
<libc-coord@...ts.openwall.com>, <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
<jwakely@...hat.com>, <enh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Ping(3): [PATCH v4] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems()
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Nice!
> Please update me on any feedback you receive.
Apparently the author is planning new versions of those papers so WG14
discussion is waiting for those.
> So glibc will basically hold this patch
> at least until the WG answers to that, right?
I think that whether C2x gets an array-size feature of some kind is
relevant to whether such a feature goes in glibc and what it looks like in
glibc, but the fact that it will be considered in WG14 doesn't rule out
glibc considering such a feature without waiting for WG14.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@...esourcery.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
