|
Message-ID: <87lfgarurs.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 17:49:11 +0200 From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com> To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> Cc: libc-coord@...ts.openwall.com, Ariadne Conill <ariadne@...eferenced.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] Add posix_spawnattr_chroot_np() * Rich Felker: > I don't like that this is storing unbounded-size state in the > attribute object, and the obvious solution to the first question (and > the second) is that chroot should not be an attribute but a file > action, the same way chdir (newly added) is. I think a chroot action should be interspersed with other file actions, so that file action are impacted by it. For example, it enables subsequent open actions to rely on the lookup-constraining properties of chroot. That's why I think it's useful. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.