|
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXj8fHDq-eFd41GJ4oNwGD5sxhPx82izNwKxE_=x8dqEA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:32:02 +0100 From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> To: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" <alx.manpages@...il.com> Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>, Christian Heimes <christian@...hon.org>, Deven Bowers <deven.desai@...ux.microsoft.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Eric Chiang <ericchiang@...gle.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>, "Madhavan T . Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Philippe Trébuchet <philippe.trebuchet@....gouv.fr>, Scott Shell <scottsh@...rosoft.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Steve Dower <steve.dower@...hon.org>, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>, Thibaut Sautereau <thibaut.sautereau@....gouv.fr>, Vincent Strubel <vincent.strubel@....gouv.fr>, Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@...el.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ux.microsoft.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 1/3] fs: Add trusted_for(2) syscall implementation and related sysctl Hi Alejandro, On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 8:56 PM Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) <alx.manpages@...il.com> wrote: > On 11/13/21 14:02, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > >> TL;DR: > >> > >> ISO C specifies that for the following code: > >> > >> enum foo {BAR}; > >> > >> enum foo foobar; > >> > >> typeof(foo) shall be int > >> typeof(foobar) is implementation-defined > > > > I tested with some version of GCC (from 4.9 to 11) and clang (10 and 11) > > with different optimizations and the related sizes are at least the same > > as for the int type. > > GCC has -fshort-enums to make enum types be as short as possible. I > expected -Os to turn this on, since it saves space, but it doesn't. Changing optimization level must not change the ABI, else debugging would become even more of a nightmare. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.