|
Message-ID: <54046232de974a3687e4af6366c8ba18@intel.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:50:06 +0000 From: "Ma, XinjianX" <xinjianx.ma@...el.com> To: Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> CC: "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, lkp <lkp@...el.com>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "christian.brauner@...ntu.com" <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>, "containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, "jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>, "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>, "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 5/9] Reimplement RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE on top of ucounts > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 9:11 PM > To: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> > Cc: Ma, XinjianX <xinjianx.ma@...el.com>; linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org; > lkp <lkp@...el.com>; akpm@...ux-foundation.org; axboe@...nel.dk; > christian.brauner@...ntu.com; containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org; > jannh@...gle.com; keescook@...omium.org; kernel- > hardening@...ts.openwall.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux- > mm@...ck.org; oleg@...hat.com; torvalds@...ux-foundation.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/9] Reimplement RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE on top of > ucounts > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:47:14AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > "Ma, XinjianX" <xinjianx.ma@...el.com> writes: > > > > > Hi Alexey, > > > > > > When lkp team run kernel selftests, we found after these series of > > > patches, testcase mqueue: mq_perf_tests in kselftest failed with > following message. > > > > Which kernel was this run against? > > > > Where can the mq_perf_tests that you ran and had problems with be > found? > > > > During your run were you using user namespaces as part of your test > > environment? > > > > The error message too many files corresponds to the error code EMFILES > > which is the error code that is returned when the rlimit is reached. > > > > One possibility is that your test environment was run in a user > > namespace and so you wound up limited by rlimit of the user who > > created the user namespace at the point of user namespace creation. > > > > At this point if you can give us enough information to look into this > > and attempt to reproduce it that would be appreciated. > > I was able to reproduce it on master without using user namespace. > I suspect that the maximum value is not assigned here [1]: > > set_rlimit_ucount_max(&init_user_ns, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE, > task_rlimit(&init_task, RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE)); > > [1] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kerne > l/fork.c#n832 Thank you for confirming the issue. And will you plan to fix this issue? If it's your plan, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <xinjianx.ma@...el.com> > > > > If you confirm and fix the issue, kindly add following tag as > > > appropriate > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@...el.com > > > > > > ``` > > > # selftests: mqueue: mq_perf_tests > > > # > > > # Initial system state: > > > # Using queue path: /mq_perf_tests > > > # RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE(soft): 819200 > > > # RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE(hard): 819200 > > > # Maximum Message Size: 8192 > > > # Maximum Queue Size: 10 > > > # Nice value: 0 > > > # > > > # Adjusted system state for testing: > > > # RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE(soft): (unlimited) > > > # RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE(hard): (unlimited) > > > # Maximum Message Size: 16777216 > > > # Maximum Queue Size: 65530 > > > # Nice value: -20 > > > # Continuous mode: (disabled) > > > # CPUs to pin: 3 > > > # ./mq_perf_tests: mq_open() at 296: Too many open files not ok 2 > > > selftests: mqueue: mq_perf_tests # exit=1 > > > ``` > > > > > > Test env: > > > rootfs: debian-10 > > > gcc version: 9 > > > > > > ------ > > > Thanks > > > Ma Xinjian > > > > Eric > > > > -- > Rgrds, legion
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.