Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o8coq9yr.fsf@disp2133>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 15:37:32 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: legion@...nel.org,  LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,  Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,  Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,  linux-mm@...ck.org,  Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,  Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,  Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,  Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,  Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,  Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Count rlimits in each user namespace

Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:27:07 +0200 legion@...nel.org wrote:
>
>> These patches are for binding the rlimit counters to a user in user namespace.
>
> It's at v11 and no there has been no acking or reviewing activity?  Or
> have you not been tracking these?

Most of the reviews were noticing things that needed to be changed.

For the ack/review by tags I am the one reviewing it and merging the
change so I guess I didn't give Alex any Acked-by or Reviewed-by
tags.

Regardless the changes are sitting in linux-next now and seem to be
doing fine.

Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.