[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202103312329.394CCA13CF@keescook>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 23:31:39 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/6] stack: Optionally randomize kernel stack offset
each syscall
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:38:31AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31 2021 at 14:54, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 09:53:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 30 2021 at 13:57, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> > +/*
> >> > + * Do not use this anywhere else in the kernel. This is used here because
> >> > + * it provides an arch-agnostic way to grow the stack with correct
> >> > + * alignment. Also, since this use is being explicitly masked to a max of
> >> > + * 10 bits, stack-clash style attacks are unlikely. For more details see
> >> > + * "VLAs" in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> >> > + * The asm statement is designed to convince the compiler to keep the
> >> > + * allocation around even after "ptr" goes out of scope.
> >>
> >> Nit. That explanation of "ptr" might be better placed right at the
> >> add_random...() macro.
> >
> > Ah, yes! Fixed in v9.
>
> Hmm, looking at V9 the "ptr" thing got lost ....
I put the comment inline in the macro directly above the asm().
> > Do you want to take this via -tip (and leave off the arm64 patch until
> > it is acked), or would you rather it go via arm64? (I've sent v9 now...)
>
> Either way is fine.
Since the arm64 folks have been a bit busy, can you just put this in
-tip and leave off the arm64 patch for now?
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
